The Epistemic Responsibilities of the University
TWCF Number
0163
Project Duration
September 1 / 2016
- August 31 / 2017
Core Funding Area
Big Questions
Region
Europe
Amount Awarded
$1,430,741
Grant DOI*

* A Grant DOI (digital object identifier) is a unique, open, global, persistent and machine-actionable identifier for a grant.

Director
Rene van Woudenberg
Institution VU University Amsterdam

Where does wisdom lie in the future of universities? What are the epistemic values that the modern university ought to uphold? What responsibilities flow from these values? And how can universities meet these responsibilities in the face of contemporary challenges? Vehement discussions abound about the failings of modern universities to address these responsibilities. Thus, this project aims to fill a necessary gap by scrutinizing and defending such responsibilities, and providing tools for university leaders and policy makers to meet them. Our hypothesis is threefold: 1. The primary values that the university should uphold are epistemic values: those involving truth, knowledge, rational belief, insight, and understanding. 2. A university’s values apply not only to research, but also to teaching and (intellectual) character formation. 3. Universities are responsibility for cultivating humanistic learning. To test these hypotheses, we will engage in empirical, philosophical, and theological research. To this end, we will produce peer-reviewed articles, books, conferences, and media appearances. On both national and international levels, we will target academics, policy makers, students, the general public, and opinion-leaders. Based on empirical research, the project will identify ways to prevent misbehavior and promote responsible behavior in academia. Finally, the policy recommendations that emerge will be discussed in international fora and presented to opinion leaders. As a result of this research, academics, opinion leaders, and the general public will enrich their ideas about the epistemic value of the humanities.

Project Resources

The team first identifies a variety of benefits of doing replication studies. Next, they argue that it is often necessary to improve aspects of the original study, even if that means deviating from the original protocol. Thirdly, they argue that replication studies highlight the importance of and need for more transparency of the research process, but also make clear how difficult that is. Fourthly, they underline that it is worth trying out replication in the humanities. They finish by formulating recommendations regarding reproduction and replication research, aimed specifically at funders, editors and publishers, and universities and other research institutes

Breaches of research integrity have shocked the academic community. Initially explanations were sought at the level of individual researchers ...
The threat to reproducibility and awareness of current rates of research misbehavior sparked initiatives to better academic science. One initi...
The emphasis on impact factors and the quantity of publications intensifies competition between researchers. This competition was traditionall...
Publications determine to a large extent the possibility to stay in academia (“publish or perish”). While some pressure to publish may incenti...
Abstract Background There is increasing evidence that research misbehaviour is common, especially the minor forms. Previous studies on researc...
This paper proposes a normative taxonomy by which universities can express the extent to which they meet five core epistemic responsibi...
Abstract The research climate plays a key role in fostering integrity in research. However, little is known about what constitutes a responsib...
Abstract Background Concerns about research misbehavior in academic science have sparked interest in the factors that may explain research mis...
This article is a comparison of two works of fiction, a film and a novel, that both address the question of how people deal with intense memor...
This paper explores various relations that exist between replication and trustworthiness. After defining “trust”, “trustworthiness”, “replicab...
One way to strengthen research integrity, is through supervision. According to previous research, a supervisor should be well-versed in respon...
There is an increased focus on fostering integrity in research by through creating an open culture where research integrity dilemmas can be di...
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed on this page, or any media linked to it, do not necessarily reflect the views of Templeton World Charity Foundation, Inc. Templeton World Charity Foundation, Inc. does not control the content of external links.
Person doing research
Projects &
Resources
Explore the projects we’ve funded. We’ve awarded hundreds of grants to researchers and institutions worldwide.

Projects & Resources